ARISA: Difference between revisions

From Microbial Ecology and Evolution Lab Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
PreDec2022>EricMiller
(Created page with " ==''Primers''== Use "primers ITSF (5′-GTCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTA-3′) and ITSReub (5′-GCCAAGGCATCCACC-3′)", which are, " respectively, complementary to positions 1423 and 1...")
 
m (2 revisions imported)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/85/3/483/583834#95229670  Diversity of the skin microbiota of fishes: evidence for host species specificity  
https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/85/3/483/583834#95229670  Diversity of the skin microbiota of fishes: evidence for host species specificity  
https://aem.asm.org/content/70/10/6147 Comparison of Different Primer Sets for Use in Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis of Complex Bacterial Communities
https://aem.asm.org/content/70/10/6147 Comparison of Different Primer Sets for Use in Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis of Complex Bacterial Communities
:'''Note to future researchers:''' As the first phase of this experiment was not able to test ARISA for use in the experimental system, experimentation regarding the efficacy of ARISA to measure community composition is needed.

Latest revision as of 12:56, 16 December 2022

Primers

Use "primers ITSF (5′-GTCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTA-3′) and ITSReub (5′-GCCAAGGCATCCACC-3′)", which are, " respectively, complementary to positions 1423 and 1443 of the 16S rRNA and 38 and 23 of the 23S rRNA of E. coli." [1]

Sources:

ARISA Protocol

Version 1

Note: this protocol is Copied from https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/85/3/483/583834#95229670 Diversity of the skin microbiota of fishes: evidence for host species specificity.
  1. Extracted DNA was used as a template for PCR on the internal transcribed spacer region using the ITS-FEub (5′-GTCGTAACAAGGTAGCCGTA-3′) and ITS-REub (5′-GCCAAGGCATCCACC-3′) primers (Cardinale et al., 2004).
  2. Ribosomal internal spacer analysis (RISA) was performed as previously described by Arias et al. (2006) with the following modifications. The PCR mix contained 1× Taq buffer, 0.4 mM dNTPs (Promega, Madison, WI), 0.4 μM ITS-FEub primer, 0.2 μM ITS-R primer, 0.02 μM ITS-REub labeled primer, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 U of Taq polymerase (5 PRIME, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and 100 ng of template DNA in a final volume of 50 μL.
  3. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C for 2 min, ending with a final extension at 68 °C for 7 min.
  4. Ten microliters of each PCR product was diluted with 5 μL AFLP® Blue Stop Solution (LI-COR). Diluted samples were denatured at 95 °C for 5 min followed by rapid cooling prior to gel loading to prevent reannealing.
  5. PCR products were electrophoresed on the NEN Global Edition IR2 DNA Analyzer (LI-COR) following manufacturer's instructions. One microliter of sample was loaded into each well.


Sources: https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/85/3/483/583834#95229670 Diversity of the skin microbiota of fishes: evidence for host species specificity https://aem.asm.org/content/70/10/6147 Comparison of Different Primer Sets for Use in Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis of Complex Bacterial Communities

Note to future researchers: As the first phase of this experiment was not able to test ARISA for use in the experimental system, experimentation regarding the efficacy of ARISA to measure community composition is needed.